Friday, September 19, 2008

Chaos On Wall Street, Mayhem Coming To Main Street?

I wrote my first article on gameriot about the economy back in June. At the end, I mentioned all of the bad paper floating around, and it looks like it finally come back to bite us in the butt this week.

So what exactly motivated the large downturn earlier this week? A few things, in order by time frame.

1. The Community Reinvestment Act - Started by Carter, and expanded by Clinton this was designed to increase minority home ownership. You see back in the 70's and 80's banks wouldn't make loans to people who couldn't repay them. These banks were accused of racism because often the people they wouldn't make loans to were disproportionally minority groups. So the federal government got involved and forced banks some banks to make the loans, and let others know that 'Discriminatory practices in lending will be punished.'.

2. The natural outcome of the socialism in item 1 led to banks making loans to people who couldn't afford them. After all, it's better to have a bad loan on the books than having the federal government coming to audit you, and Reverend al coming to picket you. So companies went above and beyond to make loans to people who shouldn't get them. Some intelligent people in the banking business even reasoned that real estate "always goes up" so things should work out for the best.

3. Some smart people at the banks realized this whole idea probably sucks. They rolled up home mortgage loans, and resold them to other banks. The ratings agencies that should police this sort of thing, overvalued the mortgages that were sold. this led to investment banks buying up mortgages from traditional lending institutions with the impression they were solid investments.

4. In 1999 Clinton repealed the Glass-Stegal act, which contained important safeguards to keep banking institutions solvent. Replacing Glass-Stegal was a bill written by banking lobbyists, pushed through by Republicans in congress.

5. Interest rates were kept artificially low throughout the Clinton and Bush years by Alan Greenspan, which made lending easier for the banks.

6. President Bush tried to reform Fannie and Freddie a few years back, but was shot down by the democrats. In typical "What me worry?" fashion, he resumed paying attention to his crusades in the middle east rather than pushing the issue domestically.

7. Banks got very wacky in the past few years during the housing bubble. Since the CRA stuff went so well, they decided that housing would never ever go bad, and basically gave loans to anyone who could fog a mirror.

8. Housing prices declined, first hurting the Subprime market, and now the regular housing market. People are stuck in situations where they have no equity in their home, and have loans larger than the value of the house. This makes defaulting an attractive option.

9. Investment Banks started realizing all these bundled mortgages they have aren't worth what they should be. Some might be worth pennies on the dollar. Once that shit started hitting the fan a few months ago, people started selling the stocks of the investment banks, leading some of them to insolvency.

So those are the basic things that led to this mess. I probably missed a few details, but whatever. Both the Republicans and Democrats are blaming each other for this mess, but it's really the fault of both parties.

So why is the market rebounding? Well, the fed decided to ban short selling, and is considering the creation of a government trust to buy all the bad mortgages from the banks, to try to work out deals with the owners to keep them in their houses.

Put very simply, we had one socialist program designed to get poor people into housing. That program dragged the economy down, so now the government is going to socialize the losses onto the taxpayer, and replace the program with outright socialism. The government will basically become the mortgage lender for these people who shouldn't have had mortgages in the first place.

Since the government doesn't want to own a bunch of shitty real estate, odds are the people having problems will get sweetheart deals to keep them in their houses.

People who actually behaved responsibly will get stuck with the tax bill.

While many people are blaming capitalism for this debacle, it's clearly the results of government interference in private markets. The banking system should work pretty easily. Banks make loans. If said loans aren't paid back, then the consumer defaults and the bank gets whatever collateral there was. If the bank makes too many bad loans and goes under, then fuck it, it goes under. That is capitalism.

Telling banks they must lend to those that are unqualified, then bailing out certain banks while letting others fail is not capitalism. It is socialism mixed with a tinge of corporatism and a shitload of stupidity.

In the government's mad dash to fix these problems in an election year, they've socialize (ie taken over) the largest insurance company in America, along with the two biggest mortgage lenders. The government is now on the hook for these companies if they fail, possibly to the tune of trillions of dollars.

As our government falls further and further in debt, the US dollar looks less attractive to foreign countries. When it gets to the point that foreign countries will no longer invest here because the US government is basically insolvent, then the party ends.

At some point America has to wake up and realize that everyone can't have everything. As a society we can guarantee equality of opportunity, but not equality of result. At some point, we need our politicians to become serious people, rather than pie in the sky socialists trying to create utopia.

EDIT: A short addendum: If the actions taken today (the govt buying the bad paper from the banks and the ban on shorts) do not "work", you're likely seeing the start of another Great Depression.

This was running a bit long for a blog entry, and I didn't even get into the Credit Default swaps, who Hank Paulson worked for before, or all the sweet conspiracy theories about Hedge funds and SWF's killing companies on purpose. But considering you're all from gameriot, odds are you don't read past the first four paragraphs anyway. ;)

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

haha, in your face! I read all of it (I am from GR).

Good stuff. You should just make another post with the stuff you left out; Hank Paulson, conspiracy theories, etc, etc.

Anonymous said...

I might have to bookmark this page...I don't know why GR doesn't just let this shit get posted. I like how these posts combine trolls and political news. Makes for entertaining reads.

Anonymous said...

Didn't seem to be much of a troll post, though...

It's an 'our economy is fucked--here's why' post.

Anonymous said...

I read all of it also. Please do not stop writing, even if this is getting less traffic than gameriot.

Anonymous said...

the world economy already has investors running towards the east and its hard to believe people will regain there confidence in the american economy especial when the government is the one thats preventing all from falling apart, and if that fails like you said it might create another great depression. Hard to see how investors will go back to the amercian market when there are more "stable" markets in the world.

NyeT said...

"At some point America has to wake up and realize that everyone can't have everything. As a society we can guarantee equality of opportunity, but not equality of result. At some point, we need our politicians to become serious people, rather than pie in the sky socialists trying to create utopia."

That was funny. Good blog though Vir.

Anonymous said...

I'm from gameriot and I read the whole thing. I'm glad not everyone is stupid, but I'm sad that it doesn't matter.

Anonymous said...

I'm going to keep reading, even though I'm not a gamer. I found your 'cage fight' post on your WoW blog. You make some good points here. I'm reading as much as I can now, trying to find out how all this stuff happened. What a mess.

Anonymous said...

Nice post Vir. These government bailouts really have me concerned for the future of this economy. =/

LordVir said...

Good stuff. You should just make another post with the stuff you left out; Hank Paulson, conspiracy theories, etc, etc.
...
I don't know why GR doesn't just let this shit get posted. I like how these posts combine trolls and political news.


If you want GR to let me post, bitch at them. They usually listen to their users. :)

I think people are disapointed, this post and my most recent one tonight weren't really troll posts.

I'll have to be less serious in my next one...and maybe talk more about Obama. ;)

LordVir said...

I read all of it also. Please do not stop writing, even if this is getting less traffic than gameriot.

I just started tracking my statistics a bit, I'm not getting as much traffic as I was while on gameriot but it's not that bad either.

Of course I could never really tell what my traffic was on gameriot, I had to guess based on the blogging contest numbers.

Would you guys rather I write more like my gameriot posts (ie, Troll Obama) or serious stuff?

LordVir said...

Hard to see how investors will go back to the amercian market when there are more "stable" markets in the world.

If we really end up with a great depression, I don't think there will be many stable markets in the world.

LordVir said...

I found your 'cage fight' post on your WoW blog.



How did you end up finding that? :D

Anonymous said...

I like how these posts combine trolls and political news. Makes for entertaining reads.

I wasn't really clear here. I actually enjoy reading the troll and political comments on posts like these, not the post itself.

Post was good.

Anonymous said...

Damn you edit button!

You know what I mean.

Anonymous said...

Definitely a case of government and political interference in the loan industry.

Your writing is good, but if you regurgitate it with a more right wing antagonistic slant - it's sure to bring the liberals out crying.

It actually all depends on where you want to go with your writing and if the history of your writing might matter some day.

Anonymous said...

Jesus chrrrrist Vir, good trolling there I'll give you that.

Banks were not "forced" by your government to give out tons and tons of loans to people who couldn't pay them. They did so for one simple reason: greed.

With the idiotically low interest rates set by Greenspan's Fed money was cheap, the economy booming after recovering from the IT bubble. The housing market was running especially hot, the rise of prices appeared infinite, which lead to rather overconfident bankers. They thought nothing of lending money to underqualified would-be housemakers, as even if they couldn't be able to pay the loan back the bank would make a nice profit since in the event of a default on the mortgage they would simply repo the now even more valuable property.

What made the milk go sour though was when a few bankers thought up a way to make even more money: when you wrap up the high-risk subprime loans into nice packets with great interest rates, toss in a few solid loans aswell, and the whole package gets the best credit ratings, making it seem like a low risk, high interest investment. Due to the false credit ratings the financial markets ate the things up like a black man devours fried chicken, the worst case scenario and in fact the only way you were going to lose your money was if the huge investment banks went bankcrupt, a laughable idea.

Guess what? The poor bastards that got suckered into taking huge mortgages they couldn't pay by greedy bankers who would then be able to sell the loans on for a nice profit. When they defaulted, the whole stack of cards came tumbling down as a result.

This financial crisis is shitting all over everybody's economies because there wasn't enough regulation of the financial market by the government, not because of some feel-good excuse of a socialist law.

Anonymous said...

Hey epakesa, good to see you've dropped by!

I don't totally blame our affirmative action programs, I'm sure greed had a lot to do with it. But to say that the desire to increase minority home ownership had nothing to do with it, would be ignoring the truth to remain politically correct.

Check this out It's a bit long, but it explains the situation better than I do.

I don't blame a lack of regulation, our markets are regulated plenty. They're just regulated the wrong way. The 1999 law that got rid of our safeguards that were put in during the 1930's was written by the banking industry. It's insanity to allow private companies to write law, but that is exactly what happens here.

If we had a totally free market, where the government did not interfere, banks would not give out loans to people who couldn't afford them, and if they did, they'd simply fail.

-Vir

Anonymous said...

I've been a bit busy what with uni and all (economics/finance, btw ;) so haven't been online a lot. Social networking is so exhausting.

A totally free market wouldn't have been the miracle cure against crisis such as this one. It was created by selling merchandise that did not fit the description advertised, it's as simple as that.

1. Greedy Mortgage bank A gives out a subprime loan with a very high interest due to the inherent risks involved, making a killing from trading fees. They don't mind the risk since they're just going to dump the loan on

2. Greedy Investment bank B that buys the loan and packages it with a ton of others and gets it an >A-credit rating, again making a big buck and passing the risks on by selling it on to

3. Much larger players such as the five huge american investment banks who at this point only see a high interest bond with minimal risks. The banks make a ton of money from trading fees as t investors all over the world hug the housing bubble via the now indistinguishable subprime derivatives.

The banks kept giving out loans and buying them and selling them onwards since it was such a great business for them.

What went wrong here was not the first step of the pyramid, as banks should be allowed to loan money to anyone they wish. What pushed the pile of shit in front of the fan was the hiding of the risks involved with these loans. The cord was wound tight and long enough that the guys at other end had no idea the strands they were hanging on to hadn't been fastened to anything.

Anonymous said...

epakesa,

If banks here were audited by regulators all the time. If they didn't meet their 'community reinvestment act' requirements (ie, they didn't loan to enough minorities) then the FDIC didn't let them do a bunch of stuff, including opening up new branches.

On top of that, they'd have lawyers like Obama suing them for 'racism' if they didn't loan to unqualified people of color.

This was caused by idiotic government programs.